Project

General

Profile

Bug #3370

missleadings when creating/editing true/false/don't know

Added by Marko Kastelic about 10 years ago. Updated almost 9 years ago.

Status:
Bug resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
1.9.2
Start date:
05/05/2011
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Spent time:
0.50 h
Complexity:
Normal
SCRUM pts - complexity:
?

Description

red marked labels should be change to avoid mixing between choice and value

Files

miss.PNG (25 KB) miss.PNG Marko Kastelic, 05/05/2011 14:58
ma_tfd2.png (21.4 KB) ma_tfd2.png Marko Kastelic, 13/08/2012 09:59
t-f-dont.png (25.3 KB) t-f-dont.png Julio Montoya, 13/08/2012 11:39

Associated revisions

Revision 9e13b3dc (diff)
Added by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

Changing labels see #3370

Revision 7f5316f1 (diff)
Added by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

Moving fields in question see #3370

Revision d3cd8dab (diff)
Added by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

Improving UI in a question see #3370

History

#1

Updated by Yannick Warnier about 9 years ago

  • Target version set to 1.9.2
#2

Updated by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Needs testing
  • Assignee set to Yoselyn Castillo
  • % Done changed from 0 to 50

I changed the labels (for the red circle) to "Correct" and "Wrong"

#3

Updated by Yoselyn Castillo almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs testing to Bug resolved

These labels avoid mistakes.

#4

Updated by Marko Kastelic almost 9 years ago

yes,
before closing i would like to see some 'standardization' of the question form: eq: if you look at the multiple answer/global you can see the form sequence as : question->enrich question->advanced settings->option(s)/answer(s)->result(s)
on the other hand, T/F/Don'tknow introduces the sequence: question->enrich->advanced settings->result(s)->options(s)/answers(s)
than : difficulty/category can be (with some question types) shown at full, with others 'hidden' under advanced settings ...
the more I'm thinking about, I think that will an unification of all the question types be quite a job. New future?

#5

Updated by Yannick Warnier almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Bug resolved to Needs more info
  • Assignee changed from Yoselyn Castillo to Yannick Warnier

Agreed. Shouldn't be closed so fast.

#6

Updated by Marko Kastelic almost 9 years ago

quick look at the other question types shows that ponderations/results are placed at the right or below the options/selections: so just place ponderations for T/F/don't know after options(answers).

#7

Updated by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs more info to Assigned
  • Assignee changed from Yannick Warnier to Julio Montoya
#8

Updated by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Needs testing
  • Assignee deleted (Julio Montoya)
  • % Done changed from 50 to 80

Fields were moved

#9

Updated by Marko Kastelic almost 9 years ago

i stil see ponderations for 't/f/don't know' before answer section in Multiple Answers true/false/don't know.
Can be ponderations placed into one row (something like in the right part of the picture below ?

#10

Updated by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

make sure you have the latest changes, we add branches to the chamilo repository, so be careful when you do "hg update" make sure you're in the 1.9.x branch ... you can specify a revision "hg update -C -r xxxxx"

I have this in the current code

I will do that change if it doesn't take too much time ...

#11

Updated by Marko Kastelic almost 9 years ago

just saw your #5301 post ... and, yes, beeznest's shows moved fields ....

#12

Updated by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

I just updated the UI

#13

Updated by Marko Kastelic almost 9 years ago

  • Assignee set to Julio Montoya

very good. I don't think there's anything else, so i'm leaving you to close this issue.

#14

Updated by Julio Montoya almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs testing to Bug resolved
  • Assignee deleted (Julio Montoya)
  • % Done changed from 80 to 100

Closing

Also available in: Atom PDF